Palm Clinging to 1% of US Market Share
According to the latest Nielsen survey figures, WebOS is rapidly losing market share to Android, iOS, and BlackBerry, as it clings to just 1.3% of the overall U.S. smartphone market share. Stunningly, Nokia's Symbian OS, long considered a no-show in the US market, still has nearly 3x the market share than that of WebOS.
Even more chilling, according to Precentral.net, is Nielsen's classification of "Palm OS" in its data—this includes both WebOS devices and classic Palm OS Garnet devices such as Treos and the Centro. According to Nielsen, Palm's WebOS, presumably falling into the catch-all category of "other", did not even make a dent in the "next desired smartphone operating system" figures.
Article Comments
(59 comments)
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PalmInfocenter is not responsible for them in any way.
Please Login or register here to add your comments.
RE: Hold that Line!
Numenta (Jeff Hawkins) invested years of development in their NuPic 'intelligent' software, then recently obsoleted it and started over with 'HTM cortical learning algorithms' to simulate neuron columns. Nothing happening there 'till sometime in 2011 when they release new software.
I'll keep checking back here to see Gekko's latest youtube links but it just isn't what it use to be.
For now, my iPad and NetFlix are keeping me happy.
Grandpa Gary
Tech Center Labs
www.talestuff.com
www.iTalentProductions.com
RE: Hold that Line!
Thanks for all your contributions. I actually am one of the few that actually posses a new device around here, so it's kinda crickets for anything more than market discussion and Gekko being envious of my homebrew apps.
Thx for doing the hardware that Palm refused to do. Keep the contributions coming.
Pat Horne
RE: Hold that Line!
RE: Hold that Line!
I'll keep it going for a while, still selling a few mics/week and a little of the other stuff. When I do take it down you can find me on the web and I'll always have left over inventory available. I still can't believe that a company could be so clueless to think they could dump everything that built them and start over. Well, I'm happy that Apple & Google are providing what Palm failed to, we need our cool toys!
Gary
Tech Center Labs
www.talestuff.com
www.iTalentProductions.com
RE: Hold that Line!
Gary you are SO right with that comment.
The day Palm dumped all their Palm OS devices and hide them, even removed them from their palm.com site was the day I knew they were totally off track, mismanaged, panicking and dead.
RE: so i guess this is how it all ends?
I still wonder, why did Access buy Palm OS?
RE: so i guess this is how it all ends?
I will be sad when WebOS is dead and gone, but I got over IBM os passing into the great os heaven. However before we get too weepy lets wait on some of HP Palm phones and tablets. Some of us may get a surprise when it rises from the dead. I've been using my Pre and it is the closest thing to Palm os that is out there. But that doesn't mean I am not hedging my bets. I still use the Droid, wifi of course, to surf when riding the stationary bike or don't feel like firing up the MacBook.
OBTW, CalorieCounter for Android just got an update and is now more like BalanceLog for Palm than ever before. We're almost there. Absolute Fitness for WebOS needs an update because it is lagging far behind. It's usable but barely.
Have a nice day!
Pilot 1000->Pilot 5000->Pilot Pro->IIIe->IIIc->M500->M505->M515->TC->T3->T5->Treo 650P->Treo 700P->Droid>Pre Plus
RE: so i guess this is how it all ends?
why did Access buy Palm OS?
I suspect Access is asking itself that very question!
Knowing what we now know, was Palm correct in snubbing Cobalt/ALP and creating WebOS?
Cobalt's and ALP's hardware requirements seem modest for today's hardware; were they too far ahead of the hardware of the time?
Let's not forget that unlike Cobalt and ALP, WebOS actually made it into consumer's hands.
If Palm hadn't distracted itself with the Foolio then maybe it would have been a different story today.
I think even Access have now conceded to Android; they've produced Graffiti for Android.
Android is the coffin, nail, shovel and dirt for ALP.
RE: so i guess this is how it all ends?
To this day, I still have trouble believing Cobalt was *that* bad. Surely whatever was wrong with it couldn't have been so horribly broken that some dilligent troubleshooting couldn't have resolved it well enough to run on at least average PDA & smartphone hardware from 5-6 years ago.
Had the Palm OS 5.x line effectively ceased around the time of the T3 in 2003 or the Treo 650 in 2004, the several years leading up to (and even for a time after) the iPhone could have been Palm's for the taking if they'd had a halfway-competive OS solution.
Smartphone users in 2004-2006 weren't asking for cloud-based sync & apps stores, HD screens, video calling, simultaneous voice/data etc. They just needed something that could support hardware a notch or two above the Treos that Palm was shipping with Garnet at the time...such as 802.11b/BT/WWAN support, more than 32mb RAM and maybe a 320x480 screen.
If you take the money spent by Accesfor the PalmSource acquisition, used by Palm for endless Garnet patching, the Fooleo debacle, and, ultimately, WebOS development/marketing, that would have been a LOT of $ that could have gone toward perfecting Cobalt. Essentially, what is now today's Android could have been the 3rd or 4th generation of ALP (or any Linux-based Cobalt successor) had there been a proper migration path from Palm OS 5 past its anticipated EOL date in the the 2004-2005 timeframe. I distinctly remember around time of the OS5 launch in 2002 that OS5 was intended to be a stopgap solution for a year or two while the true next-gen OS was readied. Whoops!
Pilot 1000->Pilot 5000->PalmPilot Pro->IIIe->Vx->m505->T|T->T|T2->T|C->T|T3->T|T5->Zodiac 2->TX->Verizon Treo 700P->Verizon Treo 755p->Verizon Moto Droid + Verizon Palm Centro-> Verizon Moto Droid X + Palm TX
RE: so i guess this is how it all ends?
i believe Cobalt was an unfinished mess by the time they needed it and Colligan et al passed. they decided to run with PalmOS and WinMob until they could rush out webOS. regardless - i don't think Palm had the talent or resources to compete with the iPhone and Android Tsunami that was coming in 2007-2009 - so it's all a moot point. Cobalt or ALP would not have saved them - even if they weren't both an unfinished mess. iPhone and Android simply changed the game in such a drastic way that Palm's fate was sealed.
RIM is screwed too.
http://gizmodo.com/5708768/can-you-figure-out-wtf-rims-ceo-is-talking-about
http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20101207/rim-co-ceo-mike-lazaridis-live-at-dive-into-mobile/
RE: so i guess this is how it all ends?
Palm had a s**tload of good apps and savvy developers when the iPhone was just a twinkle in Steve's eye. They threw away everything betting on the cloud. With a compatible transition they'd still be in the game.
Gary
Tech Center Labs
www.talestuff.com
www.iTalentProductions.com
RE: so i guess this is how it all ends?
there's an old saying - "Anybody that CAN play in the NFL - IS in the NFL."
think about it.
RE: so i guess this is how it all ends?
Google's VP of Engineering, Andy Rubin, utilized the social-network Twitter to drop some knowledge on the world. Mr. Rubin notes that his company's mobile operating system is now being activated on over 300,000 phones each and every day. That's over 2.1 million phones every week and over 9 million phones every month.
http://www.bgr.com/2010/12/09/andy-rubin-over-300000-android-phones-are-being-activated-every-day/
RE: so i guess this is how it all ends?
Can anybody remember whether Sony announced the discontinuation of the CLIEs before or after the PalmOne/PalmSource split?
What if Sony had purchased the Palm OS or even the pre split Palm itself? Would we have a super duper CLIE smartphone today?
RE: so i guess this is how it all ends?
1. what makes you think Sony could have saved Palm in the smartphone space? Sony couldn't save Sony in the smartphone space.
2. what makes you think HP can save Palm in the smartphone space? HP couldn't save HP in the smartphone space.
why do people constantly cling to the notion that a giant company who failed in the smartphone space can save a smaller company who failed in the smartphone space? what changes? what's the magic? what's the catalyst? how does 1 + 1 = 100?
"oh - if only XYZ Company had bought Palm we would have Palm superphones today."
really??? why?
RE: so i guess this is how it all ends?
Sony did quite a bit of good early on in the Clie days by pushing Palm to improve their devices with color screens, multimedia, more RAM etc. But towards the tail end of the Clie era, those devices became "me too" rehashes with questionable design decisions and quirks software. In a way, Palm, PalmSource, and Sony are all culpable for fragmenting the Palm OS market too much with having to write different versions of apps varying DIA standards, high-res screens support, etc. Same essential thing is happening to Android right now, just at a magnitude of about 1000x bigger.
Sony basically took what they learned with the Clie line and applied it to the PSP, so I doubt if they ever even looked backwards.
Pilot 1000->Pilot 5000->PalmPilot Pro->IIIe->Vx->m505->T|T->T|T2->T|C->T|T3->T|T5->Zodiac 2->TX->Verizon Treo 700P->Verizon Treo 755p->Verizon Moto Droid + Verizon Palm Centro-> Verizon Moto Droid X + Palm TX
RE: so i guess this is how it all ends?
Sony announced the end of the domestic Clie line in mid-2004. The PalmSource spin-off occured throughout 2H 2003. By early 2004, we were well into the lame "Palm0ne" branding era (ugh).
2004 and most of 2005 were REALLY bad years for us Palm faithful. Other than the TX, almost nothing positive occured during that time, as Palm did nothing but release weak devices that were inferior to their predecessors while foolishly spending countless $ on lawyers, repackaging, and rebranding.
The Handspring acquisition of 2003 WAS a good move as it delivered them the Treo 600 which was a huge improvement over Palm's only in-house smartphone (T|W).
Sony was already well into their PSP efforts by the time they decided to jettison the Clies. I don't think they had anything to do with the spin-off. That was just more Palm corporate shenanigans and smoke'n mirrors maneuverings..
Pilot 1000->Pilot 5000->PalmPilot Pro->IIIe->Vx->m505->T|T->T|T2->T|C->T|T3->T|T5->Zodiac 2->TX->Verizon Treo 700P->Verizon Treo 755p->Verizon Moto Droid + Verizon Palm Centro-> Verizon Moto Droid X + Palm TX
RE: so i guess this is how it all ends?
Gary> A failed because they didn't have the talent, B failed because they didn't have the bucks. A + B = success! That's why.
Tech Center Labs
www.talestuff.com
www.iTalentProductions.com
RE: i love this ad
I am extraordinarily disappointed by this POS. Why?
1. No removable storage. That is unforgivable and, IIRC, the first for an Android device. Totally limits the flexibility and expandability of the devices and makes it looks like Samsung it doing a cheap & lazy Palm/Apple/Microsoft cash-grab to force users to buy new devices instead of being able to expand their onboard storage. I have 8gb built-in + 32Gb & 2x 16Gb microSDHC cards for my Droid X now. One is full of movies, one is full of high-bitrate songs and the big one has maps for offline navigation plus plenty of room for "whatever" else, since I have taken to just using my phone in lieu of a USB thumbdrive 90% of the time if a microUSB cable is present. This really sucks.
And the WHOLE point for the big Froyo hoopla was "Apps2SD". This may also break compatibility for a lot of older apps (think GPS) & games that download a lot of data to external storage and expect there to be a microSD card. What if they're not updated to be Gingerbread-friendly? This is going to be a very weak phone for developers and will only further fragment the Android market...again, unless Google's wanting to push for non-expandable storage in all future devices.
2. Only 16gb offered for internal storage. This is almost 2011, people. It's not 2008-2009. Another lame move that looks like something Palm would've done.
3. Lame Samsung plasticky build quality
4. No AT&T-compatible 3G bands. So you're stuck on T-Mobile and with EDGE most elsewhere.
5. No HSPA support. Also a shame, especially with the surprisingly nice reports of T-Mobil's beefed up "almost 4G" network.
6. No dual-core CPU. While the 1Ghz Hummingbird should be PLENTY fast for most peoples' needs, this isn't a true Nexus One successor at all. It only marginally improves on the CPU/GPU front, Bluetooth, and wi-fi and takes a step backwards in expandability, build quality, and network flexibility. It also loses the nifty trackball from the Nexus.
Samsung & Google should've just released a special "limited edition" unlocked version of the Galaxy S running stock Gingerbread and left it at that.
Pilot 1000->Pilot 5000->PalmPilot Pro->IIIe->Vx->m505->T|T->T|T2->T|C->T|T3->T|T5->Zodiac 2->TX->Verizon Treo 700P->Verizon Treo 755p->Verizon Moto Droid + Verizon Palm Centro-> Verizon Moto Droid X + Palm TX
RE: i love this ad
Funny you like it so muhc--others are calling it the worst ad of the year:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/07/google-nexus-s-ad-is-it-_n_792980.html
I agree that it doesn't do much to showcase the device. Weak ad, weak device. Bring it on, HTC & Moto!
Pilot 1000->Pilot 5000->PalmPilot Pro->IIIe->Vx->m505->T|T->T|T2->T|C->T|T3->T|T5->Zodiac 2->TX->Verizon Treo 700P->Verizon Treo 755p->Verizon Moto Droid + Verizon Palm Centro-> Verizon Moto Droid X + Palm TX
RE: i love this ad
here's a less-hipster more-device-focused version of the ad -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXGfL9bhddc
RE: Ruby interview
interesting. wow.
----------------------------------------
3:12PM Kara: Okay, so when is your phone coming out? Is the Palm name going to continue?
Jon: What do you think?
Kara: No, kill it.
Jon: Okay you heard it here first. You know honestly I have no allegiance to it. It has some good connotations, it has some bad.
3:29PM And that's it. No new devices. No details. Nothing really. We still love you Jon, but you need to release some new hardware.
RE: Ruby interview
http://tinyurl.com/2bcu6qk
The last known classic PDA user.
I'm Living The Google Lifestyle
I'm Living The Google Lifestyle
Mark Cuban, Blog Maverick | Dec. 10, 2010
Gmail, Android, Google TV... Google is taking over my life, and it's awesome.
http://blogmaverick.com/2010/12/10/am-i-living-the-google-lifestyle/
RE: I'm Living The Google Lifestyle
Gary
Tech Center Labs
www.talestuff.com
www.iTalentProductions.com
RE: I'm Living The Google Lifestyle
grandpa - what in the hell are you talking about? if you keep talking like this we're going to have to send you away to the old folks home.
RE: I'm Living The Google Lifestyle
this is how they make money -
http://thenextweb.com/mobile/2010/10/15/android-pulling-in-1-billion-revenue-this-year/
RE: I'm Living The Google Lifestyle
= trap slamming shut, punk.
Tech Center Labs
www.talestuff.com
www.iTalentProductions.com
RE: I'm Living The Google Lifestyle
what are you talking about??? so what's wrong with them wanting to make money? they've found a really unique and innovative business model - offer free open services in exchange for search and ad revenue. Google wins, their shareholders win, and their customers win. and since my data, files, and media are not locked into some proprietary format (like iTunes) i can painlessly export and disengage at any time.
what exactly are you afraid of, grandpa? the future? well you can't stop it.
RE: I'm Living The Google Lifestyle
http://paidcontent.org/article/419-analyst-apples-closed-iad-system-gives-android-room-to-grab-market-shar/
Tech Center Labs
www.talestuff.com
www.iTalentProductions.com
RE: I'm Living The Google Lifestyle
if they ruin the user experience - users will bolt. it's a free market economy in action.
RE: I'm Living The Google Lifestyle
It just worries me that Google is so blatantly putting their hardware partners and developers first and making the customer a distant 3rd, yet the platform is still becoming more fragmented by the day.
As an example, have any you guys ever tried to deal with Google's so-called "support" or gain access to a Gmail account where you forgot the password? Total futility! I know several people (myself included on Droid 1 launch day last year) who had their Android devices "set up" by a VZW or Sprint employer in-store and never knew what their new Gmail pasword was. The rep just made up something on the fly and/or didn't write it down or give alternate contact info for the customers' account. Little goofs like this become major debacles when you want to switch devices or do a hard reset!
Click here for the full story discussion page...
Latest Comments
- My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST((SELECT/**/CASE/**/IS_SRVROLEMEM
- My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST((SELECT/**/CASE/**/IS_SRVROLEMEM
- My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST((SELECT/**/CASE/**/IS_SRVROLEMEM
- My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000
- My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000
- My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000
- My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000
- My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000
Hold that Line!
Pat Horne