More Virtual Keyboards Waiting in the Wings
Many companies are exploring the possibilities of virtual keyboards. At last week's CeBIT, Samsung demonstrated the Scurry, a prototype that has a bracelet for the wrist as well as several rings to capture hand and finger movement and allow the user to enter text. The company sees it being used with handheld and wearable computers. The first version goes on just one hand; The next, called Scurry 2, will make use of both hands. While it currently connects to a computer with cables, Samsung says the final version will use Bluetooth wireless networking. Samsung hopes release the Scurry by the end of this year for about 50 or 60 Euros (about $45 to $55 US).
Another possibility still being developed is the Senseboard Virtual Keyboard. It is made up of two sensors that attach to the user's hands which are connected with Bluetooth or wires to a sled that fits on a handheld.
Sensors in the units measure the finger movements and artificial intelligence and a language processor determine appropriate keystrokes or mouse movements.
The user can type onto a surface or onto the air. It can be used with the Qwerty keyboard layout or others, though Senseboard Technologies hasn't yet said which others.
The company also hasn't committed releasing a version for any handheld platform yet. It is not yet known when this product will be released or at what price.
Thanks to Manuel for his help with this article. -Ed
Related Information:
Article Comments
(29 comments)
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PalmInfocenter is not responsible for them in any way.
Please Login or register here to add your comments.
Comments Closed
This article is no longer accepting new comments.
RE: This only works if...
RE: This only works if...
RE: This only works if...
There's just no way to replicate hunt-and-peck typing with these, since there's nothing to look at. And even touch-typing can be difficult if you start tapping outside the area where the letter you want is.
Now, a Bluetooth enabled ASL glove/ring system would be excellent for data input on the go. Especially if anyone can develop a visual interface that fits inside standard eyeglasses, rather than the cumbersome goggles/projectors currently available. As it stands, you still have to be holding your handheld or sitting in front of a screen to see what you're putting into the system, limiting this to the realm of 'nifty gadget'.
RE: This only works if...
Exactly! If you don't have the skill to accomplish 100 wpm in Graffiti then you shouldn't even own a pda. A keyboard, virtual or otherwise, just 'accounts' for lack of skill. (geez...)
RE: This only works if...
RE: This only works if...
Learning to type is for morons. I use 2 fingers and can out type all the idiots who learned using MAVIS BEACON.
I type 80 WPM with 2 fingers and 100% accuracy.
RE: This only works if...
I don't see how typing relates to ownership of a PDA. Did you ever consider that some folks may be using their PDA as a laptop replacement? (Shock! Horror! People are using it for more than PIM functions! AHHHH!) There are some folks, including myself that are very proficient with Graffiti, but realize that for long documents, taking notes in meetings, etc. that typing is the better way to go. Ownership of a keyboard for your PDA doesn't always signify a lack of Graffiti skills.
As for our 80WPM wündertypist, that's great that you can do that kind of speed with two fingers... just imagine what you could do if you used all ten. I can't speak for the "idiots" (sheesh) that used Mavis Beacon, but with touch typing I'm at 95WPM. I'd say that's quite a bit better... and I'm able to focus on my work instead of staring at the keyboard.
Ignorance is for morons. Learning to type is for the educated, and those who wish to be successful.
Oh, and it does look like at least Senseboard's product is making some adaptations for the hunt-and-peckers out there. From their FAQ: "...and for those who do not know the touch-typing technique, the different letters can be labelled onto the upper part of the product (the strap) to guide the user. You can also find touch-typing tutorials available on the internet." At least you can stare at the stickers on the back of yoru hands in place of a keyboard.
RE: This only works if...
...or maybe this will be marketed for people who can actually type! Just because someone is gadget-hungry, does not give them the right to complain about something that they want but can't use.
RE: This only works if...
You should learn to type with ten fingers and you will really type 80wpm or much more
RE: This only works if...
> can out type all the idiots who learned using MAVIS
> BEACON.
>
> I type 80 WPM with 2 fingers and 100% accuracy.
This person is:
a) a liar
b) dumb
c) for real (99% unlikely)
d) a funny troll
If you're option 'a', then it's no wonder you're hiding behind IMA. If you're 'b', well.. no need to explain. If you're 'c', then I guess all those extra terrestrial anal probes helped out a lot. And if you're 'd', okay.. then I fell for it.
In any case, I had a pretty good laugh reading this. Thanks.
Jim
RE: This only works if...
And ... how often are you going to type long documents on your PDA? Where you can just ignore the PDA screen? Not often since there are many fields. And I say this ... LEARN TO TYPE.
RE: This only works if...
RE: This only works if...
Having a little trouble relating sarcasm to that post, also, heh?
Hey, I'm real, real delighted that you are an accomplished touch typist. But I'll bet you dollars to doughnuts that the makers of these 'virtual keyboards' are very much interested in input from those of us that aren't. They're interested in as large a market as possible. And that includes us un-skilled types that have to look down at the keys. Afterall, the makers of standard keyboards care about us...that's why they print the letters on the keys.
>I won't use a Palm until it has a complete voice interface, because I never learned how to read or write.
Looks like you have the 'writing' part down pat. Oh, wait, you can't read this.
RE: This only works if...
Grow up ya bunch of girls!
Tech stuff was made for the Stupid to make things easier, not harder.
Piss Off ya bunch of ****s!!!
Typing...
When I was in High School (23 years ago!!!), typing class was one semester and optional. Advanced typing was two semesters and as one genius above here pointed out, mostly populated by girls. This is the class I took (heh, and folks said I was stupid. I repeat, MOSTLY GIRLS. heh)
Anyway, it amazes me that today, when computers are so commonplace, that a) High Schools don't have mandatory typing classes and b) that people *DON'T* go out of their way to learn how to type.
Trust me folks, as someone that has been making a living off of the computer industry for over twenty years now, good typing skills DO MAKE A DIFFERENCE.
RE: This only works if...
Agreed, this is one of the funniest thread I've read in a while. Still, I didn't take 'typing' or 'keyboarding' classes to learn touch typing. Just trial and error mostly.
So to all you hunters and peckers (no pun intended), you should allow yourself to try touch typing (if you haven't already). I started out hunting and pecking, but later realized I wanted to keep my eyes focused ON screen (or from source material that I'm copying) rather than lift my head back and forth from my keyboard to screen.
A world of difference. Eh.. what's the worst that can happen? If you find you don't like it, you can go back to being a hunter and pecker (again, no pun intended). But at least then you can rant all you want about us touch typists. ;)
Jim
Minimalism
Of all three, I like this concept
http://www.palminfocenter.com/view_Story.asp?ID=3173
the best. The two in this article will be fine for those that strap them on along with all of their other work-releated gear, but they are not appealing to regular (non-enthusiast) consumers.
RE: Minimalism
RE: Minimalism
Here's my virtual middle finger...
RE: Here's my virtual middle finger...
mental keyboards? You know, wires connected directly into
the brain that can be used to send data directly into the Palm? That would be nice
RE: Here's my virtual middle finger...
But seriously, I just read that a lab somewhere was successful in implanting a chip in a monkey's brain and the monkey was able to move a cursor on a screen as a result. Maybe this is where we are heading.
RE: Here's my virtual middle finger...
Graffitti Keyboards.
If you want blazing, "real keyboard" speed than you are going to want a real keyboard anyway just for the tactile feedback if nothing else.
Nathan
Virtual keyboard yes.. qwerty, no
The best solution, other than pure mental or voice control is likely to be a glove type device that connects, either wirelessly or with wires to you PDA. You hold the PDA with the left hand and then by using your thumb touching your index finger tip would produce an A, touching the side between the tip and first knuckle a B, first and second a C, and so on.
You can get at least 28 separate combinations using single finger thumb combinations.
The technology is easy, learning is easy, letters can be printed on the glove. You get nice tactile feedback, you don't need a solid surface. You don't need a huge device or sled attached to PDA. Its discrete. Of course its going to make our thumbs more muscular and agile (like mobile phones are apparetnly)
And of course a left hand version is very easy to develop.
RE: Virtual keyboard yes.. qwerty, no
RE: Virtual keyboard yes.. qwerty, no
I'm a user interface aficionado and I've learned to touch type in the QWERTY and Dvorak keyboard layouts. I achieve 80 WPM with Graffiti, and I'll even learn FITALY if I have to.
I'm glad that the technology has finally become available to make "air" keyboards possible. I'm a fan of one-handed chording keyboards and finger-touch combination entry methods, I can't get enough of it!
I do not like using American Sign Language to enter text for the simple reason that others can easily read what you're entering by just watching your gestures.
RE: Virtual keyboard yes.. qwerty, no
You'd be suprised at the speed you can attain, and combined with an intelligent layout of characters, speed could be up at 40-50 wpm
Latest Comments
- My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST((SELECT/**/CASE/**/IS_SRVROLEMEM
- My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST((SELECT/**/CASE/**/IS_SRVROLEMEM
- My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST((SELECT/**/CASE/**/IS_SRVROLEMEM
- My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000
- My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000
- My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000
- My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000
- My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000
This only works if...
Just something to think about.
ScottG