Palm Expands Internal RAM Capabilities
Palm Solutions Group has announced it has overcome the 16MB internal memory limit. Palm Solutions and PalmSource engineers collaborated to develop memory technology that extends the amount of RAM possible on a Palm OS handheld from the current 16MB to 128MB.
The memory breakthrough has been incorporated into Palm OS by PalmSource, in OS version 5.2.1 and will make the development available to other licensees. As of today, the most amount of ROM a Palm Powered device has shipped with is 16MB.
"We're delighted that Palm Solutions Group took the lead on this technology enhancement," said David Nagel, president and chief executive officer of PalmSource. "Cooperative development in partnership with our licensees gives the Palm OS platform faster innovation and benefits the entire Palm Economy."
"The range of potential next-generation hardware and software solutions expands tremendously with this innovation from Palm Solutions engineers," said Steve Manser, senior vice president of product development for Palm Solutions Group. "Our memory advance means customers can be confident they'll have what they need to deploy robust business applications or rich multimedia."
Article Comments
(181 comments)
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PalmInfocenter is not responsible for them in any way.
Please Login or register here to add your comments.
Comments Closed
This article is no longer accepting new comments.
RE: Very cool!
Well, that would seem to be the reason for Palm to break their 16MB internal memory limit, now wouldn't it?
______________________________
An armed society is a polite society.
cool
At least this is WAY better than those chintzy (sp) Memory Stick Selects. Good think I don't own a 5 MP Sony digicam, otherwise I'd be pissed.
RE: cool
RE: cool
My camera supports MS Pro and I think I will stick with regular MS (for now) because they can be had cheaper ($36 for a 128) and I can swap em between my clie and my camera (or have one in each)
jmlg
(trying to think of a clever signature line)
RE: cool
RE: cool
I take it that's a full 2 hour movie. What frame rate and data rate did you use? Just curious, as I plan on doing the same thing once I get a device with decent audio. Well, decent audio AND video! The video is real good on my 515, and the audio is really good on my PPC.
Good for sales
USB 2.0 or FireWire needed
USB 2.0 or Firewire interfaces are needed as RAM increases.
It's hell HSing my lowly mono CLIE S320 -- because I have over 500 files on it. With 128MB -- I could have, say, TEN THOUSAND?
RE: USB 2.0 or FireWire needed
Cheer up, take this as good news. I'm sure they'll switch to USB 2.0 soon. But as it is, when I'm installing large applications, I don't sync them. I use MSImport to bring them to the MS and then move the file to RAM. Putting a 50 MB file on the card takes a few minutes on MSImport, while it'll take maybe an hour during HotSync. As long as this MSImport solution is available to me, I could care less about Hotsync.
-Bosco
Proud Member of the Top Non-Mods
Members: abosco and ImpReza M3
Now accepting new applications
RE: USB 2.0 or FireWire needed
RE: USB 2.0 or FireWire needed
RE: USB 2.0 or FireWire needed
RE: USB 2.0 or FireWire needed
RE: USB 2.0 or FireWire needed
RE: USB 2.0 or FireWire needed
And MSImport is *not* on the lowly mono S320. Sony was so nice to create class warfare among their users by putting it on the more expensive units. So, I see you are one of these Rich Fat Pigs we must deal with Come the Revolution! (HA!)
USB 2.0 and Firewire -- NOW!
RE: USB 2.0 or FireWire needed
Just took 33 seconds to go through a RAM sync of 387 files totalling 8.14Mb including PocketMirror & Docs2Go conduits. The backupbuddy 256Mb SD card sync takes another minute, though. Not a lot has changed between syncs, but if you had a Palm with 64Mb presumably most of the RAM contents wouldn't change between syncs, so 2 mins is probably a valid upscale unless you have apps that will alter vast files between syncs.
RE: USB 2.0 or FireWire needed
--
"Life is what you experience between racing games"
Galley
RE: USB 2.0 or FireWire needed
RE: USB 2.0 or FireWire needed
My Compaq Laptop has both Usb 2.0 and Firewire built in. Sony Desktops and laptops hae firewire built in.
RE: USB 2.0 or FireWire needed
RE: USB 2.0 or FireWire needed
RE: USB 2.0 or FireWire needed
RE: USB 2.0 or FireWire needed
At some point Palm will switch from 1.1 to 2.0 or (doubtfully) FW (my preference). But if they don't by say, tomorrow, I don't care. I'd rather have the space than the sync speed.
Or maybe they should just not produce any units with 32MB, 64MB, or even 17MB internal memory until they increase the sync speed. Afterall, it's not like anybody really needs more than that for built-in memory. Or more than 640k.
I'm sure it *never* occurred to Palm that with a lot more memory could probably use a boost in sync speed. If they ever figure it out, I'm sure they'll produce.
______________________________
An armed society is a polite society.
RE: USB 2.0 or FireWire needed
Just like other licensees get free run on thier innovations for a period of time, I think Palm should too. Palm did all the dirty work.
RE: USB 2.0 or FireWire needed
Personally, I think somethings wrong. Mine takes only about 30-60 seconds unless I am also syncing AvantGo or my Mail. Mail is really slow and AvantGo sometimes takes time if it finds a lot of updates.
I've got other conduits running (Bonsai, TimeSync, etc), too. Unless I've made a lot of changes, it's very fast. ...and I'm using serial to sync!
Another thing to check is if you've ever run a program like BackupUpAll. It sets the backup bit on all files in memory. Not a huge issue, except with the big AvantGo file. Since it changes every time you sync, it will then get backed up every time you sync. I had that issue once and had to disable the backup bit manually.
15-20 minutes sounds like the time it took me to sync via Infrared. Gave that up fast!
Rolando
RE: USB 2.0 or FireWire needed
RE: USB 2.0 or FireWire needed
But, my last PC was a 200 Mhz laptop and it was still really fast to sync.
I have about 300 files on my T665.
I still say that there's something else up with your configuration.
Roland
RE: USB 2.0 or FireWire needed
it's NOT a bandwith problem of USB 1.1
The slow hotsyncing is not because of USB, theres a bottleneck somewhere on the Palm. I think its slow at copying multiple small files
(think DOS ... copy vs xcopy)
RE: USB 2.0 or FireWire needed
It would be interesting to see which conduit takes the longest. I do see your point though... I'd hate to restore a full 128Mb device that had beeen wiped out :)
RE: USB 2.0 or FireWire needed
It is probably a combo of three things:
1) SmartDoc
2) HS software
3) the s-l-o-w sub-GHz PC I have to use
SmartDoc, BTW, is obsoleteware, but it's the best DOC editor I've ever used and perfect for my current use.
RE: USB 2.0 or FireWire needed
RE: USB 2.0 or FireWire needed
Remove the bottleneck and allow a Palm device to communicate at the full bandwidth of USB 1.0: a sync takes as little as ten seconds.
Allow a Palm device to sync at USB 2.0 or FireWire: a sync takes as little as two seconds.
Allow a Palm device to sync at FireWire 800 (or whatever): a sync takes as little as one second. Instantaneous.
OK, these numbers are a little wild. But there's possibility there! I think people are too used to waiting minutes at a time for their Palm device to finish syncing.
RE: USB 2.0 or FireWire needed
Without Avantgo, my 8MB Visor takes 17 seconds to sync (just timed it), and that's dealing with a dozen documents in Docs to Go, connecting with my mail server, etc. There's something very wrong if someone's waiting MINUTES for a hotsync, baring stuff like Avantgo (or slow mail servers, etc.) where you're waiting on external data. And I don't think your computer's speed matters much. When I used a Pentium 1 200 that was fast too. So even with USB NOT being the bottleneck, it's still plenty fast, since most of the time you're not changing that much on it.
What?
RE: What?
RE: What?
Palm needed to release a faster PDA when it did. People were buying PPCs in droves because they didn't understand that the Palms were more capable ... all they saw were big numbers ... remember, the processors used in the OS5 units won't run OS4 ... also, OS5 added capabilities ...
RE: What?
That argument is bogus. Yes, some DragonBall processors did have limitations in the amount of physical memory they could address. So what? They were still full 32bit processors. The number of address lines coming out of one version of a CPU doesn't have anything to do with the OS architecture. Palm didn't have to code any memory limitations into their OS, and the fact that they did shows a lack of foresight.
RE: What?
But, if the CPUs hadn't had the limitation, the OS never would have been written that way - OS programmers, working in *LOW*-level code like they do, used to tend to write for what was available. Now, of course that's changed ...
There is, however, a better example of the principle I stated above - does anyone remember the 640k barrier of the DOS of yore >:)
When MS-DOS 1.0 (Seattle Comnputing's QDOS) was bought, PCs didn't have more than 1 MB of RAM - we were saddled with that bottleneck for years ...
Either way, Palm has finally fixed it ...

Click here for the full story discussion page...
Latest Comments
- I got one -Tuckermaclain
- RE: Don't we have this already? -Tuckermaclain
- RE: Palm brand will return in 2018, with devices built by TCL -richf
- RE: Palm brand will return in 2018, with devices built by TCL -dmitrygr
- Palm phone on HDblog -palmato
- Palm PVG100 -hgoldner
- RE: Like Deja Vu -PacManFoo
- Like Deja Vu -T_W
Very cool!
Jon Niola
President/CEO
Media Vortex, Inc.