More than 50% of US Doctors Use Handhelds

A new survey from a medical software solution company reports that more than half the doctors in the US use a PDA, and among residents and students the percentage is even greater. The study goes on to point out the benefits and productivity enhancements handhelds provide in health care as well as areas for future growth.

The new survey, shows significant results about doctors’ increasing reliance on their PDAs and their impact on daily activities. More than 85 percent of the survey respondents pointed to PDAs as helping to reduce the number of medical errors, with more than 50 percent of doctors indicating PDA use reduces their medical errors by more than 4-5 percent.

The survey of more than 900 doctors who use handheld computers was conducted by Skyscape, a leading provider of enterprise-wide mobile medical and nursing reference solutions. Skyscape has researched PDA effectiveness for medical professionals for almost a decade—beginning with a landmark Constellation Project involving a study of Apple’s Newton platform with Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital.

“The survey results reinforced what we knew of the benefits PDAs bring medical professionals, but the impact PDAs have when it comes to reducing medical errors, and improving efficiencies, exceeded our expectations,” said RJ Mathew, vice president, marketing and business development for Skyscape. “The survey clearly shows physicians have moved into a mainstream reliance on PDAs and medical software for PDAs. The results show that just like the stethoscope, the PDA is increasingly becoming an integral tool in doctors' daily practice and by integrating medical references we can enable doctors and their enterprises to realize even greater benefits.”

Respondents to the Skyscape survey stated that PDA use provides significant benefits by enabling them to spend more time with patients, while still treating more each day, and by improving the overall quality of patient care. Specific results include:

Palm Tungsten C ~ Click for Larger

  • More than 88 percent of doctors use their PDAs at least four times a day, with 15 percent using their PDAs more than 25 times a day.

  • When asked how they use their PDAs, 72 percent of doctors reported they rely on their PDA for treatment purposes—primarily using it for drug references, clinical references, drug interaction guides or hospital treatment guidelines.

  • Almost 90 percent of the doctors concluded that PDAs help them provide better care.

  • Over 85 percent of physician respondents agreed that by using a PDA they had decreased the number of potential medical errors. And more than 50 percent communicated that by using a PDA they were able to eliminate over 4 percent of medical errors.

  • When asked to quantify the specific benefits PDAs bring to their daily practice, almost 20 percent of respondents concluded that PDA use enables them to treat at least three more patients a day, with another 20 percent of respondents concluding that they can treat 1 – 2 additional patients per day.

  • Doctors do not just rely on one reference for their PDA. More than 70 percent of doctors have at least three medical references on their PDA and 22 percent have more than eight references.

  • Medical software for PDAs is increasingly being integrated with other applications but there is still significant room for growth. In each case less than ten percent of medical professionals reported their PDA software is integrated with prescription, billing, charge capture or patient records systems.

Over the next year, medical professionals will further increase their PDA usage, with industry analyst firm Forrester Research reporting that 90 percent of all health systems are engaged in a handheld project or are considering one.

With the National Academy of Science – Institute of Medicine reporting that medical errors cost the healthcare system $2 billion a year, this equates to preventing more than $100 million in preventable drug errors alone. Yet less than 20 percent of medical professionals have their PDA software integrated with the larger hospital IT enterprise, signifying an area where there is still room for significant growth.

Article Comments

 (8 comments)

The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PalmInfocenter is not responsible for them in any way.
Please Login or register here to add your comments.

Comments Closed Comments Closed
This article is no longer accepting new comments.

Down

Eh?

M3wThr33 @ 12/19/2003 12:54:33 PM #
No Palm VS PPC comparisons in the article? I'm shocked.

I don't think you understand the gravity of the situation. We're in space.
RE: Eh?
Admin @ 12/19/2003 12:57:42 PM #
I can't find the exact figure to confirm, but I've heard David Nagel say at a press conference before that of Doctors that use handhelds, 75% of them are Palm Powered handhelds :)
RE: Eh?
lordmetroid @ 12/19/2003 1:21:20 PM #
It's not many students in Sweden that uses PDA's from what I know it's only a very small minority...
I can only think of 2 other people that have been using a PDA, and my University is one of the bigger (90k people),
alot of them being medecin/pharmacy student...
It's because Uppsala is the leading in medecin/biochemistry education in Sweden
RE: Eh?
spaskey @ 12/19/2003 2:13:52 PM #
An October 2001 study by the American College of Physicians (ACP) found that 81% of the doctors who were using handhelds were using a Palm-powered device, versus 7% for PPC.

RE: Eh?
atc24 @ 12/19/2003 7:12:16 PM #
My mom, who's a doctor, and most of her colleagues use Palm OS. Many things, like drug interactions, can be very quickly checked and kept up-to-date. I know my mom likes POS better than PPC, mostly because the PPC's interface is clumsy (it doesn't look good in front of patients when a doctor takes forever to look something up), and they have less applications.
RE: Eh?
Tuckermaclain @ 12/19/2003 9:43:20 PM #
Palm got in first with all the useful medical software. The fact that I can now buy 5MCC for PPC won't make me switch platforms. The thought of carrying around (and using) a copy of Windows makes me shudder. Palm still has lots (hundreds?) medical titles than PPC. Some are absolutely essential, like MedRules, MedCalc, PregWheel/Pregpro, etc. I don't want all my desktop Outlook junk in my pocket. I don't want to carry the Outlook schedule around that the clinic nurse made. I like my Palm Desktop. Palm now has the upper hand (IMHO) because:
1. Greater penetration of the physician market.
2. More software titles (relevent ones that don't crash--some of the best are free)
3. Simplicity and speed (a T3 will just eat up a PPC in terms of processing due to the OS--and, we're not using 505s anymore) For example, if I want to access some protocol I've written down, I can just click to the memo pad and read. I don't have to open Word with all sorts of bells and whistles distracting me and slowing the thing down--just the sweet Zen of Palm.
4. Incompatibility with PPC. If my buddies have cool Palm software (I have known relatively few docs that carry PPCs) and I want it, then I must use the Palm platform.

I'm guessing that for business users the reasons are the same. Uphill for MicroSoft.



RE: Eh?
jf1991999 @ 12/21/2003 7:55:55 PM #
PalmOS dominates the medical space in the US with more than 80% of the market. Our company sells a prescription writer and does a lot of medical shows. While there was significant PPC momentum 18 months ago that has largely faded away today. I think the release of ARM based PalmOS handhelds is the main reason for this reversal. The PalmOS hardware is now clearly superior to any PPC hardware whereas before is was clearly inferior. The overall ease of use of the Palm is another important factor.

We had been planning to roll out a PPC product but have now put it on hold. If Microsoft doesn't lift their game soon they may find themselves out of the market for good.

RE: Eh?
ardiri @ 12/23/2003 8:14:45 AM #
> It's not many students in Sweden that uses PDA's

as founder/developer for a company who develops medical software in Sweden - i can give you more definitive values :) our product, Dr. Companion (www.drcompanion.com) is currently being used by over 1000 doctors - thats just over 3% of the market. we dont have many competitors. its a hit with doctors; many cannot believe how they lived without it. (also, our package is a bit pricy, but - its not just a single book or so, is a COMPLETE reference library; comprising of 10-15 LARGE books, distributed on SD card)

i think it depends on what they define as 'using a handheld' really is. sure, a doctor could use a handheld for a datebook/calendar - doesn't mean they are using it for medical purposes. our package is specifically for doctors, brining medical references to the palm of their hand - the users who use our system purchased the handheld FOR this purpose.

50% of doctors is a marketing hype. lets find out how many doctors actually use it for *real* medical purposes. and, not just purchase it for their own management use. you know how marketing is. they twist figures. *g*

our product is being launched in the united kingdom within the next few weeks - and, the US market will follow. give me 12 months, and i can give you a more definitive value of how many doctors use handhelds in their every day work. oh well :)



---
Aaron Ardiri
PalmOS Certified Developer
aaron_ardiri@mobilewizardry.com
http://www.mobilewizardry.com/members/aaron_ardiri.php

Top

Account

Register Register | Login Log in
user:
pass:

Latest Comments

  • My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST((SELECT/**/CASE/**/IS_SRVROLEMEM
  • My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST((SELECT/**/CASE/**/IS_SRVROLEMEM
  • My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST((SELECT/**/CASE/**/IS_SRVROLEMEM
  • My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000
  • My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000
  • My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000
  • My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000
  • My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000