US Wireless Carriers Opposing Wi-Fi?
Long-term PC aficionados are no doubt familiar with the venerable John C. Dvorak, of PC Magazine fame. Dvorak is known as much for being an astute critic of all things technology-related as he is for stepping on toes with his constant criticisms and biting satire.
Dvorak's recent PC Magazine article (with reaction and commentary by MobilitySite here) plants the seed of suggestion that the U.S. wireless telcos are doing everything in their power to squash the availability of wi-fi on smartphones and mobile phones. The article goes on to theorize that the threat of widespread, free or affordable municipal wi-fi networks has the traditional cellco carriers running for the hills. Dvorak asserts that the recent proliferation of EVDO PC Card and Cardbus adapters for notebooks is nothing more than a defensive reaction to the possibility of large-scale wi-fi networks and continued advancements in VOIP services and handsets.
While the piece contains a mish-mash melding of the usual Dvorak-isms and insider intrigue mixed with old-fashioned theorizing, it's an entertaining read and certainly merits discussion, especially on what may be the eve of new Treo announcements by Palm and the likely continued dearth of wi-fi on these devices.
Article Comments
(16 comments)
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PalmInfocenter is not responsible for them in any way.
Please Login or register here to add your comments.
RE: Plausible, but...
Handspring Visor -> m505 -> Zire71 -> Zire72 -> Treo650
RE: Plausible, but...
RE: Plausible, but...
RE: Plausible, but...
"Do you know the difference between an error and a mistake? Anyone can make an error, but that error doesn't become a mistake until you refuse to correct it."
-Grand Admiral Thrawn
"Be sure you're smarter than your smartphone...ask help from palminfocenter"
RE: Well of course
Cingular, Qwest blocking ‘Free’ Calls
http://gigaom.com/2007/03/15/cingular-qwest-blocking-free-calls/
RE: Well of course
The big carriers are not trying to deny free WiFi access to the masses. They are working to help us all. I've seen their commercials!
Pat Horne
they shouldn't oppose it
A device like that is something you keep on you and the broadband data networks are avaliable everywhere (pretty much). You can't get by the same way mooching wifi from place to place.
But wifi does have a HUGE advantage for phone companies. The EVDO networks and others have limited capacity. Put a lot of people on them and they slow down. The phone companies want to offer multimedia and high speed, but in places where a lot of people are using them, the network will slow.
If a few users can offload their bandwidth to wifi, it will save the network a lot of load. In cities, for example, there are a lot of people per cell. However, there are also many wifi hotspots. If a few users on their lunch break check out some TV on their office wireless network, rather than the EVDO network, it will make a big difference in the network's performance.
RE: they shouldn't oppose it
That's just it...the phone companies don't WANT to save the network a lot of load, they want to charge you a lot to load the network.
You have it exactly backwards.
RE: they shouldn't oppose it
1. Customers complain
2. Customers wonder why they bothered going with a given service provider when their internet connection clearly is no good.
3. Customers don't buy Sprint TV or Vcast music or whatever other service they are selling for entertainment or surfing purposes.
The phone companies are well aware that they have limited bandwidth and keeping it speedy is a constant battle. Hence the long terms of service where they say they don't want you file serving, web conferencing etc etc.
Therefore, if a few users in a densely populated area get their bandwidth for web stuff from a different source, they can make a big improvement.
Would it stop people subscribing to unlimited data plans? Hardly. You can't compare EVDO or UMTS to Wifi. You can't have wifi rolling down the highway or while visiting a non-connected relative in the suburbs. Wifi works at your home, office and elsewhere it's hit or miss.
Now, if you don't mind snooping for a signal with a cantenna, that might be okay, but nobody buys a treo (which is just as much a phone as a handheld) for that sort of thing. I suppose you could try to restrict your non-wifi activities to only voice.
But considering that the unlimited data plans are pretty reasonable in price anyway, you'd be better off going with one.
Conclusion: people buy a Treo for continuously connected stuff. If you want to surf at Starbucks, get a T|X. If a few users can be offloaded to another connection method then the network performance improves. Customers buy more and have better loyalty.
Think next time before you talk. You are making no sense whatsoever!
RE: they shouldn't oppose it
DocBuzz,
I just died. :-o
Pat Horne
RE: they shouldn't oppose it
Sure the T|X is great for surfing given the screen real estate, but then I still have to carry a phone as well. I think the point of carrying a Treo is to consolidate devices. I switched from a cell phone and Palm m515 that completely served my needs to a Kyocera QCP-7135 (the only Palm device my carrier has ever had) because I only wanted to carry one device. I still use the 7135 in hopes that the rumored Treo 755p will come to U.S. Cellular. I haven't switched carriers because I'm grandfathered into a great plan and keeping monthly costs down is a big deal for me. I now also own a T|X but I don't carry it because I only want one device (and nobody seems to make a belt clip case as simple and good as the one Palm had for the Vx series). In 2007 if I want to carry only one device and sacrifice screen size to do so, it should at least have all the features of a good handheld. That includes WiFi even if all I want to use it for is connecting to my home network.
Feature Crippling
http://www.onthemedia.org/transcripts/2007/03/02/04
I hope that there is someway to pressure these companies to give us better (and currently available) phones and services.
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.
-Albert Einstein
Latest Comments
- My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST((SELECT/**/CASE/**/IS_SRVROLEMEM
- My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST((SELECT/**/CASE/**/IS_SRVROLEMEM
- My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST((SELECT/**/CASE/**/IS_SRVROLEMEM
- My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000
- My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000
- My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000
- My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000
- My comments --1' OR UNICODE(SUBSTRING((SELECT/**/ISNULL(CAST(db_name()/**/AS/**/NVARCHAR(4000
Plausible, but...