Analyst Sees Palm Developing a UMPC

After last week's revelation that Palm has had a linux project in the works over the past couple of years there was a good amount of speculation in the following discussion that Palm could have a Internet tablet/UMPC device in mind for this new platform. Vivek Arya a Merrill Lynch analyst covering Palm thinks that Palm's long hinted secret product from Jeff Hawkins could in fact be a UMPC. In Arya's latest report he states:

While details of Jeff’s speech are unknown, we believe he could announce a new Palm product. Given Palm’s traditional expertise in mobile computing, we believe the new product could be an Ultra Mobile PC - essentially a small ultra-portable laptop with wireless capability.

Article Comments

 (58 comments)

The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PalmInfocenter is not responsible for them in any way.
Please Login or register here to add your comments.

Start a new Comment Down View Full Comment Thread
I hope not
ginsberg @ 4/16/2007 8:35:11 PM # Q
If Jeff Hawkins' project is a UMPC, then we know why nobody has bothered to acquire Palm. Hopefully, whatever Jeff is working on is a lot more interesting than the brain-dead UMPCs we have seen thus far.
RE: Check out this blog entry and...
cervezas @ 4/16/2007 8:43:35 PM # Q
The mockup on the blog doesn't make any sense to me, but the idea of a modular tablet or folding PDA where you can buy and plug in whatever radio (or GPS, or camera, or massive flash drive, or XXX) you want has been something I've been wanting for ever since the demise of the Handspring Visor:

http://www.pikesoft.com/blog/index.php?itemid=120

I think a lot of PIC users (myself included) would pay for a WiFi module in addition to a built-in 3G radio (or even a removable cellular radio module). Others would pay extra for a 5mpx camera module that has lots of extra flash built into the module. Many would buy more than one module so they could morph their device as the circumstance required.

That design I drew in that 5-month old post turned out to be awfully close to the Nokia E90. A part of me wants an E90 bad, but I've been around enough mobile devices to know that these kitchen sink devices that try to do *everything* well end up making disappointing compromises. (The E90's battery life will probably suck, for example, if I used it the way I'd like to.) So I'd much prefer to be able to plug in the hardware components that I really need the most.

Not really expecting this to happen any time soon... but it sure would be cool!

David Beers
Pikesoft Mobile Computing
www.pikesoft.com/blog

RE: Check out this blog entry and...
millydog @ 4/16/2007 10:49:21 PM # Q
This is great....it might be what I am after....a UMPC with Palm OS (or Linux variation of). I envisage something like the Sony device (was it a UX50?) but with WiFi, Bluetooth, GPRS & HSPDA, more storage and perhaps a little bigger.
I am excited but want some proof...some sightings.

RE: Check out this blog entry and...
SeldomVisitor @ 4/17/2007 6:58:40 AM # Q
Well...actually my giggly-response was, if that's a NEW patent application the patent submitter better have some notes predating May 13th, 2003...

RE: Check out this blog entry and...
sungod @ 4/17/2007 7:29:09 AM # Q
cervezas
The problem with a modular design like that is you can't access 2 accessories at once.
A simple problem a customer asked me about running a T5 with a WiFi card.
What if I want to email something on my SD card using my WiFi network?
This will always turn people off the idea and and towards an all inclusive model.
Or looking like a dork wasting time in a meeting swapping cards to set up a different functionality.

How good are cargo pants, they're a gadget lovers best friend.
RE: Check out this blog entry and...
cervezas @ 4/17/2007 7:41:20 PM # Q
I agree that the SD card can't be it's own module. And some modules will necessarily contain more than one thing: Hi-res cameras should have large quantities of their own flash memory, as should GPS receivers, along with an auxilliary battery to keep battery life from plummeting when it's used.

It's probably more of a power-user geek device than Palm would be willing to target right now, but there will come a day when "pimping your phone" with cool new hardware (not just ringtones) will become a craze that companies like Palm can exploit.


David Beers
Pikesoft Mobile Computing
www.pikesoft.com/blog

RE: Check out this blog entry and...
mikecane @ 4/19/2007 11:25:29 AM # Q
Reply to this comment

Palm MID UMPC

roubaixpro @ 4/16/2007 10:40:51 PM # Q
Big news on the UMPC front this morning folks. Looks like Intel is shedding the Origami gorilla (read: Microsoft) as they prep a Linux-based platform to compete with Vista and XP-based UMPCs. Intel will unveil their new MID (Mobile Internet Device) platform at the Intel Developer Forum in Beijing later this week. Unfortunately for their marketing department, they've already posted the slides. Unlike UMPCs which target mobile professionals, MIDs will target "consumers and prosumers" and feature a range of screen sizes from 4.5 to 6-inches with resolutions from 800 x 480 to 1024 x 600. Yup, these are the same devices we spotted under the in-house name of McCaslin sporting Intel's codenamed "Stealey" class of dual-core, battery-friendly processors. Intel's reference designs run a tweaked, 500MB version of China's RedFlag MIDINUX which boots in about 18 seconds (less than 5 seconds from standby) to a mix of open-source and proprietary code including Google Maps and web-based office and enterprise applications. Data access will be provided via HSDPA and WiFi. More GUI shots and reference designs in the gallery below.

http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/16/intels-mid-umpcs-so-long-xp-vista-hello-linux/

RE: Palm MID UMPC
BaalthazaaR @ 4/17/2007 12:44:31 AM # Q
Actually I'd like to see what P.A. Semi ( http://pasemi.com/ ) processor does in a UMPC, but I haven't been able to find anything about products using their processors. I have a lot less faith in Intel after the P4 and the Itanic (itanium)
RE: Palm MID UMPC
twrock @ 4/17/2007 1:23:17 AM # Q
Yes, that MID UMPC is very interesting.

One of the interesting things is the browser icon. Looks very familiar. Hmm..., where have I seen that one before? Maybe... from the iPhone! Look out Intel. Apple's gonna sue you back to the stone age for that one.


Thinking about Vista? Think again: http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.txt
Want an alternative? Try this: http://www.ubuntu.com/ or http://www.mepis.org/

RE: Palm MID UMPC - video
SeldomVisitor @ 4/17/2007 6:56:31 AM # Q
Slides? Who needs stinkin' slides!?

Here's a Marketing video instead:

-- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HrzeiUvDZog

Reply to this comment

What is a UMPC?

analogue wings @ 4/16/2007 11:39:13 PM # Q
If you think the answer is a PDA with a big screen then good luck to you, because to most people it is an ultra mobile *PC* - something they can run their regular PC apps on. For most people, that does not mean a proprietary Linux distro, oddly enough.

IIIc -> M105 -> Zire 21 -> Tungsten T2 -> Treo 650
Reply to this comment

Didn't need to be an analyst to figure that out

Nycran @ 4/17/2007 1:18:58 AM # Q
I had that same thought a few days ago (that Palm was building a UMPC, or at least, a device with that kind of form factor).

IMHO it wont *just* be a UMPC though. Hawkins is clearing throwing in an artificial intelligence twist, presumably on the server side. Exactly what that'll mean is hard to say, but maybe there'll be some interesting preemption and automation going on.

In addition to having integrated wi-fi and VOIP, the factors that'll make this thing sell (or not), are the size (it can't be too big or it'll be a burden to carry), the battery life, the usability, the usefulness, and the price (MUST be sub $800). I'm pretty confident that Hawkins + Palm can deliver on all fronts.

RE: Didn't need to be an analyst to figure that out
SeldomVisitor @ 4/17/2007 6:53:34 AM # Q
> ...Hawkins is clear[ly] throwing in an artificial intelligence twist...

Ya think?

I don't.

Reply to this comment

Hum ...

khertan @ 4/17/2007 6:11:16 AM # Q
It's what i say since 1 year ... :)

But ... wait & see ...

Benoit HERVIER
http://www.khertan.net/

Reply to this comment

UMPC

OMEGON @ 4/17/2007 10:37:30 AM # Q
I'd just be happy with a PDA that actually did the job - enough memory to carry a number of documents, the ability to print them (Palm print standard required) without having to buy a variety of print programs for each application, and not freeze up. Yes, no card-swapping (built-in's like WiFi), expandability like sd cards, USB port(s) supporting other devices like an external hard drive, scanner, external camera, etc etc. Screen size of Tx is fine - should be able to carry in a pocket, and be under $400.00
Reply to this comment

Intel can shove their MIDs

mikecane @ 4/17/2007 12:31:04 PM # Q
After using that abomination from Nokia, I really want to stay the hell away from Linux as much as possible.

I'll take Palm's *PDA* Linux, because it will run Palm software.

But as far as Linux on anything other than a PDA (or smartphone) goes, there are just too many Windows-based tools I need for getting *full use out of the internet* that would disqualify anything Linux-based for me.

And there are other considerations about these cheap devices too:

It’s Time To Stop Looking At Cheap Devices!
http://tinyurl.com/3cnrmt

Man, you can't imagine what hell is until you've used a Nokia 770 and seen all its limitations, Internet-wise. No YouTube, no embedded MP3 playing (MySpace), etc, etc. It's like putting a ginormous condom over the Net.

RE: Intel can shove their MIDs
rcartwright @ 4/17/2007 6:19:00 PM # Q
Mike Cane said regarding the Nokia 770:
"It's like putting a ginormous condom over the Net."

That is disturbing on SO many levels. Seriously, while I really want to hope that the "Hawk" will be the uber PDA running the new Palm OS with backward compatability, multitasking, and all the other things on the Palm fanboy wish list, I am really trying not to get my hopes up. It concerns me greatly that there has not been a peep out of the developer community regarding the new OS. If Palm is shipping product by the end of the year running the new OS, then I would think that the devs have got to be seeing something by now. I recognize that they are probably still under NDA, but now that Palm has made a public statement, I would think we would have been getting at least some buzz by now. The bottom line is that I have a Star Wars sized bad feeling about this.

That said, I would like to see the Intel reference design running the new Palm OS if its real.

Rick C

"Many men stumble across the truth, but most manage to pick themselves up
and continue as if nothing had happened."
- Winston Churchill

RE: Intel can shove their MIDs
Gekko @ 4/17/2007 6:46:48 PM # Q

MikeCon - it's time to get serious and kick it up a notch!

http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/07/oqo-model-02-arrives/



Looking forward to the MIDs
cervezas @ 4/17/2007 7:06:45 PM # Q
Mike, I appreciate you going to bat for me about the Palm OS Linux thing, I really do. But your interminable griping about the Nokia 770 was tiresome 6 months ago. Get yourself an N800, or wait for Palm's STB device if you want to install Palm software, but please... give the poor 770 a rest. Nokia is about as likely to update it as Palm is to release a 700p firmware update, and even if they did it would still sorely need the doubled RAM and faster processor. That pain you've been feeling is the pain of the early adopter.

As for these MIDs, personally, I think the time for this kind of device has finally come and Intel may have the delicate balance of size/price/function/battery life/speed about right. I'll withhold judgment until I learn more, but with the right applications they could be an answer to this search:

http://mobileopportunity.blogspot.com/2006/05/desperately-seeking-info-pad.html

I'd be happy if the thing Hawkins announces at the end of May is a Palm OS Linux take on this form and feature set. I absolutely love having an instant-on, desktop-quality, multi-window browser with me when I'm mobile. And I'd love a 6 inch, 800x480 screen that I could comfortably take hand-written notes on, even if the standard Palm OS applications filled only 320px of the width of that screen.

David Beers
Pikesoft Mobile Computing
www.pikesoft.com/blog

RE: Intel can shove their MIDs
twrock @ 4/17/2007 7:08:02 PM # Q
After using that abomination from Nokia, I really want to stay the hell away from Linux as much as possible.

I'll take Palm's *PDA* Linux, because it will run Palm software.

Mike, are you basing your wholesale rejection of all things Linux based on your one bad experience with "that abomination from Nokia"? If you use that logic, there is very little "usable" software/hardware out there. The examples you mention of no YouTube or MP3 is not a problem "inherent" to Linux. It's a problem of how the vendor chooses to implement Linux, what they decide to build into "their" Linux and the apps that run on it.

Your second sentence I quoted above makes the point quite well: blame Nokia (if there is blame to be given), but don't blame Linux.


Thinking about Vista? Think again: http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.txt
Want an alternative? Try this: http://www.ubuntu.com/ or http://www.mepis.org/

RE: Intel can shove their MIDs
twrock @ 4/17/2007 8:21:07 PM # Q
(Hmm, looks like I had a posting overlap with David there.)

I'd be happy if the thing Hawkins announces at the end of May is a Palm OS Linux take on this form and feature set. I absolutely love having an instant-on, desktop-quality, multi-window browser with me when I'm mobile. And I'd love a 6 inch, 800x480 screen that I could comfortably take hand-written notes on, even if the standard Palm OS applications filled only 320px of the width of that screen.

Oh, I would agree with that. The N770 looked interesting (before Mike got got one of course) and the 800 even more so. But I'm not ready to buy just yet. The possibilities for the STB will at least keep me waiting until I see that. Unfortunately, no matter what it is, it would have to be a replacement something I already use before I'd pull the trigger.


Thinking about Vista? Think again: http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.txt
Want an alternative? Try this: http://www.ubuntu.com/ or http://www.mepis.org/

RE: Intel can shove their MIDs
hkklife @ 4/17/2007 9:40:38 PM # Q
Beersie (or anyone else who can tackle this question);

How would Linux handle something like pixel doubling and/or stretching/scaling so that a standard Palm 320x320 or 320x480 app could be blown up to fill a larger, higher-res screen (like the 800x480 you allude to)?

I will pretty much be willing to take a crack at anything Hawkins has whip up, even if it is a first-gen product. But I am just terrified about mediocre (or worse) battery life and bulk. I mean, the ABSOLUTELY largest thing I'd even look at would have to be approximate Zodiac or LifeDrive-sized.

Ideally, the Hawkins STB would come in 2 flavors. One TX-sized with lesser specs and another one Zodiac or similar-sized (larger, higher-res screen with wi-fi, more RAM, higher capacity battery).


Pilot 1000-->Pilot 5000-->PalmPilot Pro-->IIIe-->Vx-->m505-->T|T-->T|T2-->T|C-->T|T3-->T|T5-->TX-->Treo 700P

RE: Intel can shove their MIDs
twrock @ 4/17/2007 10:23:57 PM # Q
...even if the standard Palm OS applications filled only 320px of the width of that screen.

Yeah, no problem. That's how they can implement multiple windows in landscape mode. Two 320x480 Garnet apps each in their own "window" open side by side with a column left over for text entry and other icons. It'd be like having two PDA's for the price of one! ;)


Thinking about Vista? Think again: http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.txt
Want an alternative? Try this: http://www.ubuntu.com/ or http://www.mepis.org/

RE: Intel can shove their MIDs
Gekko @ 4/17/2007 10:47:06 PM # Q

Garnet on 800x480 would be like watching a B&W Analog TV signal from a bunny ears antenna on an 52" LCD 1080p Hi-Def TV. Overkill 10000x.



RE: Intel can shove their MIDs
cervezas @ 4/18/2007 12:26:17 PM # Q
twrock wrote:
The N770 looked interesting (before Mike got got one of course) and the 800 even more so. But I'm not ready to buy just yet. The possibilities for the STB will at least keep me waiting until I see that. Unfortunately, no matter what it is, it would have to be a replacement something I already use before I'd pull the trigger.

And that's the thing about the N800. For me it doesn't replace anything I already had (laptop, Tablet PC, various smartphones and PDAs). I was surprised that to find that it's a totally different animal that I use in ways I rarely if ever used any of the above devices. I've installed a few applications on it, but aside from the VNC client and PDF reader I rarely use anything but the basic Internet applications on it: Opera (usually have 4-8 windows open at any one point in time), email, and the RSS reader. It never leaves the house--it's strictly something I use when I'm relaxing on the couch, house-shopping on realtor.com with my wife, catching the news at the breakfast table, or reading documents in a comfortable chair.

hkklife wrote:

How would Linux handle something like pixel doubling and/or stretching/scaling so that a standard Palm 320x320 or 320x480 app could be blown up to fill a larger, higher-res screen (like the 800x480 you allude to)?

That's really not a Linux issue, that's just a matter of updating Garnet (same as they had to do to support the transition from 160x160 to 320x320). Shouldn't be a problem if they want to do that. 480x480 and 480x640 might be useful new resolutions to support in the Garnet layer.

twrock wrote:

Yeah, no problem. That's how they can implement multiple windows in landscape mode. Two 320x480 Garnet apps each in their own "window" open side by side with a column left over for text entry and other icons. It'd be like having two PDA's for the price of one! ;)

Exactly, which is what I proposed back in November. It's very doable, too. There are lots of times when it would be nice to have two apps open. I'd like to be able to have DiddleBug and Calendar open while I'm on a VoIP call, for example. Or to have notes or email from a previous client interaction open in one window while I take notes on the new call in another. Thing is, taking of digital ink notes will only become really useful at full resolution, in my opinion, and only then if the screen is at least 6" so your writing isn't cramped. Even more important than desktop-quality browsing, improving the ink experience is really at the top of my list for this class of device. Tablet PCs and UMPCs are painful to use for handwritten notes compared to paper and pencil and I'd most like to see a fix for this.

I'm hoping for something that fits into a nice 5"x7" leather zip case (or maybe has an integrated leather flip cover with a snap) that looks good on a desk or conference table, fits nicely in a briefcase or laptop bag, and weighs about a pound. The target audience is anyone who has to take a lot of notes, keep track of ideas, and keep all this stuff organized along with their documents, email and PIM. It should have some wiki-like software that enables you to link all these things together into a browsable web of "stuff", should have great search and tagging capabilities, and ideally should let you see everything entered on the device in a linear timeline view as well.

Once again, this would be a mobile device that fills a gap where I experience a lot of pain (piles of paper notes I have to file and find) rather than a device that replaces any of my other mobile gadgets. It's not a phone, or a PDA, or a UMPC, or an Internet tablet, or a laptop. If it replaces anything I use every day it would be a bank of file cabinets (and it will be hugely more useful to me than they ever are).

If Palm ends up focusing more on the web with the STB (which seemed to be their emphasis during Analyst Day) I'm hoping they at least get the hardware right so someone can do the software that's required for a good digital inking machine.

David Beers
Pikesoft Mobile Computing
www.pikesoft.com/blog

RE: Intel can shove their MIDs
rcartwright @ 4/18/2007 2:18:04 PM # Q
David,

I do not know if you can answer this or not, but has Palm contacted the developer community about the new OS?



"Many men stumble across the truth, but most manage to pick themselves up
and continue as if nothing had happened."
- Winston Churchill

RE: Intel can shove their MIDs
ballistic @ 4/18/2007 3:01:09 PM # Q
cervezas wrote:

I'm hoping for something that fits into a nice 5"x7" leather zip case (or maybe has an integrated leather flip cover with a snap) that looks good on a desk or conference table, fits nicely in a briefcase or laptop bag, and weighs about a pound. The target audience is anyone who has to take a lot of notes, keep track of ideas, and keep all this stuff organized along with their documents, email and PIM. It should have some wiki-like software that enables you to link all these things together into a browsable web of "stuff", should have great search and tagging capabilities, and ideally should let you see everything entered on the device in a linear timeline view as well.

Sounds like a "Foleo" to me...

RE: Intel can shove their MIDs
mikecane @ 4/19/2007 11:03:52 AM # Q
>>>But your interminable griping about the Nokia 770 was tiresome 6 months ago. Get yourself an N800, or wait for Palm's STB device if you want to install Palm software, but please... give the poor 770 a rest.

Oh shut up, N800 owner. Shrinking your genitalia with my withering comments about Nokia's garbage, am I? Making you feel personally inadequate because you wasted your money on that crap, am I?

Good!

The 770 is still very much a live issue:

1) Nokia is still selling it, and

2) http://tinyurl.com/39knk9

The Intel Linux-based MIDs are DOA:

UMPC News : VIDEO: Menlow based UMPC.
http://www.umpcportal.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=506

UMPC News : Interested now?
http://www.umpcportal.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=502

Why waste money today when you can have something *worthy* tomorrow?

I'll be blogging about this.

Oh, and Gekko, stop wanking to prOn and read, willya:

OQO Model 02 Fondle (MARCH 11th!)
http://tinyurl.com/ytqpat

RE: Intel can shove their MIDs
mikecane @ 4/19/2007 11:11:18 AM # Q
>>>Mike, are you basing your wholesale rejection of all things Linux based on your one bad experience with "that abomination from Nokia"? If you use that logic, there is very little "usable" software/hardware out there. The examples you mention of no YouTube or MP3 is not a problem "inherent" to Linux. It's a problem of how the vendor chooses to implement Linux, what they decide to build into "their" Linux and the apps that run on it.

twrock: I'll be glad to be educated about all the Linux software that's out there.

But first go explain to everyone that THIS IS NOT LIKE WINDOWS OR MAC.

1) Most software has to be COMPILED for the fekkin Linux flavor you use

2) You have to deal with a rat's nest of dependencies (ala Windows DLLs, but messier!)

3) Not all Linux software will run on all flavors of Linux (see dd_rescue: http://tinyurl.com/3avfe3)

This is why I say the Linux question now is between Palm vs ACCESS. Palm has had a large developer base. ACCESS probably has the big bucks to woo devs. (But even if they woo devs, what hardware is there for the stuff to run on?)

Nokia tried. And (rightfully!) failed.

RE: Intel can shove their MIDs
mikecane @ 4/19/2007 11:17:07 AM # Q
>>>Garnet on 800x480 would be like watching a B&W Analog TV signal from a bunny ears antenna on an 52" LCD 1080p Hi-Def TV. Overkill 10000x.

You would buy an LCD. People with taste go for plasma. We like *real* colors -- and no fekkin screen grid.

RE: Intel can shove their MIDs
hkklife @ 4/19/2007 12:16:26 PM # Q
The REAL purists like myself go with a good 1080i CRT--and all of the associated size/weight/bulk/unstylishness etc.

There's still nothin' finer than a properly calibrated Sony XBR CRT. Nothin'!



Pilot 1000-->Pilot 5000-->PalmPilot Pro-->IIIe-->Vx-->m505-->T|T-->T|T2-->T|C-->T|T3-->T|T5-->TX-->Treo 700P

RE: Intel can shove their MIDs
mikecane @ 4/19/2007 12:59:04 PM # Q
Well of course CRTs are the best. But do they really still make them? Whenever I go into a store, all I see are LCDs (yecch!), a few plasmas (oooh!), and some projection sets (ah!). CRTs? They're usually SD.

RE: Intel can shove their MIDs
BaalthazaaR @ 4/19/2007 4:04:50 PM # Q
>>> 1) Most software has to be COMPILED for the fekkin Linux flavor you use
Only if the vendor of that flavor of Linux implememnts it in a very customized way, one that dramatically departs from the typical base.

>>>> 3) Not all Linux software will run on all flavors of Linux (see dd_rescue: >>>> http://tinyurl.com/3avfe3)
Same argument as the other. It depends on the flavor. If you write your software the right way, it doesn't have a problem running on most Linux flavors especially if those Linux flavors follow the same standards base. The fragmentation of Linux is the reason for all the standards projects over the last five years.

RE: Intel can shove their MIDs
freakout @ 4/19/2007 6:38:03 PM # Q
People with taste go for plasma. We like *real* colors -- and no fekkin screen grid.

Mmmmmm. You also like a shorter overall lifespan and pixel burn-in, I take it? :P LCDs have their own advantages. People who are me go for LCD. We like a screen we can play HD games on without worrying about the HUD being permanently etched onto the display...

CRT sets are dwindling away - in Oz it's nigh-on impossible to find an HD one nowadays. If I had the space, I'd gladly have gotten one.

LCD
Gekko @ 4/19/2007 6:56:56 PM # Q

everyone knows LCD is superior to plasma.

i want to get a Sony Bravia 46" LCD but not sure about:

720p ($2k) vs. 1080p ($3K) vs. 1080p XBR ($4K)

i don't have/want a PSP, don't have/want Blue Ray, so I think anything over 720p is overkill. i don't want to screw myself for the future but i don't want to overkill a feature i'll never use.

thoughts? advice? suggestions???

?????????????


RE: Intel can shove their MIDs
hkklife @ 4/19/2007 9:50:54 PM # Q
Gekko;

No reason to pay premium price for the Sony name when it comes to LCDs. Sony & Samsung sets use essentially the same panels. Sony simply is still about a model year behind everyone else when it comes to LCD TVs. Sony are selling new 40" LCDs with a single HDMI input for more than what you can get a comparably sized panel with a better remote and many more features/inputs from plenty of any other manufacturers.

I'd recommend a 40"-46" 1080p LCD right now. Might as well go 1080p since prices are plummeting and you want to be future-proof. Most of the newer sets have 2 (if not 3) HDMI inputs. I recommend Samsung or Sharp. Vizio & Westinghouse makes nice budget-priced units but their remotes & onscreen menus are absolute garbage.

You might want to make sure you get a set with HDMI 1.3-compliant ports as well.

My rule of thumb is if it's 40" or smaller, go with 720p. If it's over 40" you might as well spend a few $ more and get 1080p.

The Samsung 4061F & 4065F are very solid 40" 1080p sets for much less than $2500. Then the higher end Sammys (like $3k and up) have the wide range flurescent backlights--those look VERY nice.

Don't pay extra for CableCard or worry about any kind of built-in ATSC/QAM tuner foolishness--it's simply not worth it since everyone should have a decent set top HD box from their cable co. or satellite provider anyway. Also don't worry about firewire ports or anything like that.



Pilot 1000-->Pilot 5000-->PalmPilot Pro-->IIIe-->Vx-->m505-->T|T-->T|T2-->T|C-->T|T3-->T|T5-->TX-->Treo 700P

RE: Intel can shove their MIDs
freakout @ 4/19/2007 10:54:05 PM # Q
This chart is handy RE: HD viewing distances:

http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/12/09/1080p-charted-viewing-distance-to-screen-size/

My BenQ 720p LCD is a beaut. Watch out for Bravias - some customers are reporting weird, cloudy patches that appear under certain lighting conditions:

http://tinyurl.com/3dxl43

RE: Intel can shove their MIDs
hkklife @ 4/19/2007 11:07:23 PM # Q
Tim;
Wow, what a difference an ocean makes! ;-) They don't even sell Acer/BenQ TVs (just LCD monitors) here in the States. At least not anywhere that I've ever been!

But the "walking dead" old electronics brands are still going very strong here: Sylvania, Magnavox, Zenith, Westinghouse, Polaroid, Emerson, and most recently, Honeywell, are all attached to any number of low-end, bargain-priced, Chinese-made LCD TVs

Pilot 1000-->Pilot 5000-->PalmPilot Pro-->IIIe-->Vx-->m505-->T|T-->T|T2-->T|C-->T|T3-->T|T5-->TX-->Treo 700P

Reply to this comment
Start a New Comment Thread Top View Full Comment Thread
Achtung! Only the first 50 comments are displayed within the article.
    Click here for the full story discussion page...

Account

Register Register | Login Log in
user:
pass: