![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Palm Stereo Headset Review By: Kris KeilhackJuly, 27, 2007 Aside from the small square screens, my longest-standing complaint with Palm’s Treo line is the frustrating lack of an industry-standard 3.5mm stereo headphone jack. While de rigeur on nearly all other types of portable consumer electronics released since the original Sony Walkman, the vast majority of mp3-playing feature phones and smartphones on the market still forego the popular 3.5mm design in favor of a 2.5mm jack, A2DP, or some sort of USB to headphone adapter. Palm has at least made some attempt to mitigate this critical flaw in recent Windows Mobile-powered Treos by incorporating stereo A2DP connectivity (standard on Treo 750 and available via ROM update on Verizon’s 700w/wx and with the release of today’s featured product, the new Palm Stereo Headset Pro. The Palm 2-in-1 Stereo Headset Pro combines a pair of comfortable stereo ear buds with an integrated microphone module.
In the Box
Testing Methodology
Initial Impressions, Build Quality & Styling In fact, the only deviation on these new Palm cans from a pair of “regular” bud-style headphones is in the cord’s in-line microphone + control module. There is a small silver call answer/hangup button integrated to the rear panel of the module and a knurled volume knob that’s bit on the tough side to turn on the right hand side. Finally, the small “mute” switch is located above the microphone opening on the front panel. The control module’s design is clean, uncluttered, and effective, though I’d like to see everything made a bit larger for easier actuation, as well as a microphone port on either side of the unit for maximum voice pickup performance.
Sound Quality & Comfort Fans of hard-hitting rock, rap, techno or action movie soundtracks should certainly look elsewhere. The Head Pro delivers fairly robust bass performance at low volumes but distorts in nearly all instances of boosting the volume to louder levels. When given milder volume levels the headphones do indeed reproduce the low end of the sonic spectrum and perform much more capably. Unfortunately, the highs and midrange become cloudy and lost amidst the buzzing bass. Additionally, delicate woodwinds or percussive effects and even secondary bits of film dialogue simply become lost in the clatter.
Extended testing did reveal several very pleasant surprises with these headphones. I found them exceedingly comfortable to wear for extended periods of time as well as easy to insert or remove. Easier, in fact, than the notoriously aggravating Shure E-series ear buds. Stereo separation was also good on the Palm ‘buds. They also do a good job of blocking out ambient noise, as I am fortunate that the average-sized ear buds fit my average-sized ears perfectly. I can imagine that other users might not be so lucky; unfortunately, Palm does not include additional sizes of buds in the package.
Microphone Quality After a few days I noticed that the mic module kept getting twisted around and tangled in the folds of my shirt. It was especially prone to entanglement when I wore a tie while testing the headset the other day.
Compatibility
Pricing & Availability
Conclusion
Pros:
Cons:
My Rating: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Article Comments
10 total comments The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. PIC is not responsible for them in any way. login or register for free in order to post comments. frankie69 @ 7/27/2007 6:10:38 PM #
Good review....bad headphone. Too bad because it looks stylish. Palm would better not call these headphones 'Pro', amateur is more accurate.
W.r.t to Audio Gateway still being a "work in progress": it's not perfect, but a lot depends on which Bluetooth headphones you decide upon. Softick keep a list of the most compatible headsets. My experience with Nokia HS-12W earbuds has been a mostly positive one: the biggest issue now isn't the minor bugs, but the major slowdown experienced when you're running it with the top audio quality options. Softick, however, have claimed that Audio Gateway can actually sound superior to the standard built-in A2DP on WinMob phones.
Second, you may note that quality level 7 (especially with "Faster Analysis" turned on) is near performance limit of Palm device and built-in Bluetooth module. I also suppose that you SHOULD hear clicks and skips when all quality settings are set to maximum. Actually, you can read Pocket PC forums and note that such bitrates are usually unreachable for Pocket PC configurations... (that's from their forums. Softick are very good about answering and responding to user's feedback, another point in their favour) It's definitely a high-wire act, and probably won't ever be as stable as a pair of wired earbuds, but after having to go through the horrible process of returning my first Treo 680 due to a broken jack, I'm not sure I'm brave enough to keep using it. Oh, and nice review, Kris. :)
Where did u fine the open box version of these? I would be interested in a pair if the price were lower.
Is there any chance this might work with a Palm TX? Now or in the future... Handspring Visor -> m505 -> Zire71 -> Zire72 -> Treo650 RE: TX?
No, the TX uses a standard 3.5mm stereo headphone connector with no facility for audio capture.
http://home.earthlink.net/~gmayhak/index.html
http://www.palminfocenter.com/news/8976/palm-tx-mini-bud-mic-review/ http://www.palminfocenter.com/news/8959/palm-tx-external-mic-review/ http://www.palminfocenter.com/news/9353/tcl-labtec-stereo-headset-review/ RE: TX?
Thanks for posting the links Kris :-)
I think our Treo Headset Adapter for the TX might work with these. I may have sent you one some time ago but maybe not. I'm backordered on parts to build more at the moment but let me know if I forgot to send you one. Gary
Thanks for the review. Interesting, though, that you suggest the $50 price tag is a bit much when you also say that your "favorite Shure E3C earbuds" go for a minimum of $119 at pricegrabber. hehe At that price, I'd buy the Palm headsets, first. TBolt RE: Money
Wow...I didn't know that a 9mm drive (on the Sony Fontopias) worked on the Treo 700p. $40! Great! Is the adapter for the Treo's 2.5mm port dependable?
Cheers.
So, I purchased the 2n1 'pro' headset and was also very disappointed with the sound quality. The high ranges were very 'tinny' and the bass range was almost non-existent. This is coming from someone who doesn't know the difference between E flat major and 'Major Tom'. Anyway, the sound quality of this headset was literally the WORST of all of the dozen or so I've used with my Treo and before that my iPod.
I thought about going back to my Sony Funtopia(?) in-ear headphones, that seem to be similar technology to the palm in-ear 'Pro' headset, because I remember they had great sound in a small form factor and stayed snug and comfortable in my ears. See this URL: http://www.jr.com/JRProductPage.process?Product=4035113 I looked at them both side-by-side, the speaker diameter was the same and I realized that the rubber ear pieces from the Sonys would work on the Palm headset. So I switched them and VIOLA! All of the sudden, the Palm headset sounded JUST AS GOOD as the Sonys. Just for the hell of it, I put the Palm rubber ear pieces on the Sony headset and AMAZING, they sounded just as bad as the Palms originally were. So, my suggestion is, if you have the old Sony Funtopias lying around or can procure replacement rubber earpieces for them (the Sonys shipped with 3 different sizes), then do it. I would also humbly suggest to Palm that they stop being miserly and ship these things with the right rubber ear pieces in 3 sizes like the Sonys do and stop (ONCE AGAIN) from giving us great products with the one fatal flaw that renders them inferior.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
![]() ![]()
![]() ![]() Special Deals
Shop at Amazon and help support PalmInfocenter
![]() ![]() |
||||